Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
Fax:011-23061477
SEEA/P/0814
Nov. 19, 2008
To
Sri Ram Vilas Paswan,
Union Minister of Steel, Chemicals and Fertilisers,
Govt. of India, Udyog Bhawan,
NEW DELHI-110001

Sub: Withholding the payment of Revenue Surplus earned by Hindustan Steel Provident Fund (H.O.) Trust, Ranchi during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 to P.F. Members including Ex-Employees.
Ref.:Our letter No. SEEA/P/0805 dt.19th June 2008 addressed to you and reminder letter No. SEEA/P/0806 dated 24th Sept. 2008- Without action as yet.
Hon’ble Ram Vilas Ji,
I would like to draw your kind attention to the above referred letters. This has remained without action for over five months now. I repeat our request to you to get our Revenue Surplus earnings held illegally by SAIL/RDCIS, Ranchi for over 11 years now. The details of the case was supplied with our above letter in June this year alongwith 7 enclosures in 26 pages.
I request you to please advise SAIL to order for release of this money without further delay so that Ex-Employees can get a relief when they need it most .
With kind regards,
Yours faithfully,


(V.N.Sharma)
President



Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED
UNDER RTI ACT 2005
appellate.authority@sailex.com
No. SEEA/P/0813
Nov.17, 2008
Executive Director (P&A),
(Appellate Authority under RTI Act 2005)
SAIL Corporate Office,
3rd Floor, Ispat Bhawan, Lodi Road,
New Delhi-110003

Sub: Unsatisfactory reply from Sri G.G.Gautam, AGM (Pers) & PIO
Ref.: Letter Nos. PER/RTI/B-425(A)(3)/08/119 and 127 dated 29th Sept. and 29th Oct. 2008 respectively
Dear Sir,

This has reference to our letter Nos.SEEA/P/0710 and 0711 dtd 28.11. 2007 and SEEA/P/0803 dtd May 21, 2008 addressed to SAIL Chairman for redressal of our grievances. We are sure that our letters and reminders to SAIL Chairman must have been dealt with by him and there must be some record of his order, advice, directive or queries in the form of noting on the file. In stead of providing us with the desired information your PIO forwarded the same to PIO, RDCIS, Ranchi taking shelter u/s 6(3) of RTI Act. Thus an attempt was made by your PIO to derail the process of redressal of our grievances by wrongly invoking section 6(3) of RTI Act. SAIL is a Corporate Authority and all the Policies and Rules for the Company and its Units are made by them and their implementation ensured. RDCIS is a Unit and a subordinate Authority under SAIL and functions mostly on the basis of delegated powers. He should have known that RDCIS, not PIO, RDCIS has jurisdiction over redressing our grievances and issuing orders or implementing an order. We have enough evidence in the documents referred to show that issues like withholding the payment of Revenue Surplus by HSPF/ RDCIS, delay in ordering medical treatment to non-Ranchi SAIL employees at Ispat Hospital, Ranchi and fixing the Electricity tariff for the leased houses in SAIL Township illegally are all being carried out explicitly or implicitly by an order of SAIL. This has further resulted in negative and inefficient functioning of present RDCIS Management.

It must be clear from the above argument that we desired to have exact information as to what was done by SAIL Chairman on our requests. We hope it is clear now that replies by PIO, RDCIS, Ranchi will not meet the desired objective.
In view of the facts stated above I request you to provide us with the information desired under the Act vide our letter No. SEEA/P/0807 dated 24th Sept. 2008 addressed to PIO, SAIL.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,

(V.N.Sharma)




Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED
UNDER RTI ACT 2005
e-mail: cpfc-epfo@nic.in
SEEA/P/PF/0812
Nov 17, 2008
To
Assistant Central Commissioner (CSD)
& Appellate Authority under RTI Act 2005,
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhika Ji Kama Place, New Delhi-110066.

Ref.: Unsatisfactory reply from Sri Uttam Prakash, PIO & Asstt PF Commissioner (PID) vide his letter No. PID/EZ/30/08/57184 dated 29th Oct 2008
Dear Sir,
This has reference to our letter No. SEEA/P/cpfc/0709 dated Nov. 20, 2007 addressed to CPFC with 26 pages of enclosures and two reminders by e-mail on the issue of withholding the payment of PF Revenue Surplus for the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 and 2002-03 by HSPF of SAIL/RDCIS, Ranchi to our members. Since the issue is hanging for a total of over 11 years and for about one year with the CPFC we desired to have the following information from your PIO under RTI Act 2005 vide our letter No. SEEA/P/PF/0808 dt Sept.26, 2008 and SEEA/P/PF/0810 dt.Oct.21, 2008
1. Complete details of the action taken by your office in this regard including the reasons of delay for the aforesaid payment to our members. Please provide documents including noting on the file, if any.
2. The reasons for not issuing directive to RPFC, Ranchi/RDCIS Management/ HSPF Trust in spite of a clear advice issued by your Central Office on 21st Nov. 2003 with regard to this payment?
3. Whether necessary action has been initiated against RPFC, Ranchi for not enforcing their order dated 14th June 2006.
4. Whether necessary action has been initiated against HSPF/ RDCIS for the unlawful act of not honoring your order dated 21st Nov. 2003 and the order of RPFC, Ranchi dated 14th June 2006.
I am sure our letter to CPFC must have been dealt with by him and there must be some record of his order, directive, advice or queries in the form of noting on the file. In stead of providing us with the desired information your PIO forwarded the same to RPFC, Ranchi who failed to implement the order/ guidelines of the CPFC of Nov. 21, 2003 and his own order dtd. 14th June 2006 and against whose inaction the letter to CPFC was written. It must be clear from the above argument that we desired to have exact information on what was done by CPFC. This cannot be replied or answered by RPFC, Ranchi. Hence the approach of the PIO is derailed from the objective and spirit of the RTI Act 2005 and thus unsatisfactory.
In view of the above we request you to provide us with the desired information under the Act.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,

(V.N.Sharma)



Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED

No. SEEA/P/0811
Oct. 21, 2008

Sri G.G.Gautam,
AGM (Personnel) & PIO,
Steel Authority of India Ltd.,
18th Floor, Scope Minar,
North Tower, Core-1,
Laxmi Nagar Distt. Centre,
Laxmi Nagar,
NEW DELHI- 110092.

Ref: Request for Information under RTI Act 2005 vide our letter No. SEEA/P/0807 dated Sept. 24, 2008 and your reply letter No. PER/RTI/B-425(A)(3)/08/119 dated 29th Sept. 2008

Dear Sri Gautam,

This has reference to your above letter according to which my subject letter seeking information under RTI Act 2005 has been forwarded to DGM (P&A), RDCIS for “Future correspondence in this regard.” I have to say the following.
1. That, RDCIS did not take appropriate action for more than 2-4 years on different issues mentioned in the subject letter. Hence we approached Chairman SAIL for redressal of the grievances.
2. That, no action and no response made by SAIL Chairman for about 11 months now even after several reminders indicate that SAIL has become insensitive and incommunicable on the issues of Ex-Employees pending with SAIL including on monetary matters.
3. That, the contents of your letter point out that SAIL has no responsibility towards the Ex-Employees and no authority to mend the functioning of the RDCIS Management whereas SAIL is equally responsible for (1) withholding of payment of Revenue Surplus, (2) Issuance of Medical Cards to SAIL Ex-Employees from other Plants/Units at Ranchi in Ispat Hospital,.Ranchi (3) violation of the Electricity Act in fixinig electricity tariff and other issues raised in our letter.
In view of the above I request you to kindly provide us with the information sought for in our above reffered letter under RTI Act 2005. The application fee of Rs. 10/-has already been deposited with the earlier letter.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,

(V.N.Sharma)
President




Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED
UNDER RTI ACT 2005
SEEA/P/PF/0810
Oct.21, 2008
To
Sri Uttam Prakash,
Asstt. Provident Fund Commissioner (PID),
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhika Ji Kama Place,
New Delhi-110066.

Sub: Delay in payment of P.F. Revenue surplus by HSPF for the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 and 2002-03 to our members.
Ref.: Our letter No. SEEA/P/cpfc/0709 dated Nov. 20, 2007 (copy enclosed) with 26 pages of enclosures and two reminders by e-mail
Dear Sir,
Please refer to our above letter on the issue of non- payment of PF Revenue Surplus by HSPF of SAIL/RDCIS, Ranchi. Since the issue is hanging for a total of over 10 years we would like to have the following information from you under RTI Act 2005.
5. Complete details of the action taken by your office in this regard including the reasons of delay for the aforesaid payment to our members. Please provide documents including notings on the file, if any.
6. The reasons for not issuing directive to RPFC, Ranchi/RDCIS Management/ HSPF Trust in spite of a clear advice issued by your Central Office on 21st Nov. 2003 with regard to this payment?
7. Whether necessary action has been initiated against RPFC, Ranchi for not enforcing their order dated 14th June 2006.
8. Whether necessary action has been initiated against HSPF/ RDCIS for the unlawful act of not honouring your order dated 21st Nov. 2003 and the order of RPFC, Ranchi dated 14th June 2006.
A crossed Indian Postal Order (No. 75E 643454) for Rs. 10/- is enclosed herewith against the required fee for the Information sought.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,


(V.N.Sharma)
President





UNDER RTI ACT 2005
SEEA/P/PF/0809
Sept.27, 2008
To
CPIO (Under RTI Act 2005)
Central Provident Fund Commissioner,
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhika Ji Kama Place,
New Delhi-110066.

Sub: Delay in payment of P.F. Revenue surplus by HSPF for the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 and 2002-03 to our members.
Ref.: Our letter No. SEEA/P/PF/0808 dated Sept. 26, 2008
Dear Sir,
By mistake the fee of Rs. 10/- could not be attached to the above referred letter sent by SPEEDPOST yesterday while asking for information about the non- payment of PF Revenue Surplus by HSPF of SAIL/RDCIS, Ranchi. A Crossed IPO No.75E 643453 for Rs. 10/- is enclosed herewith for the purpose.
Thanking you,

Yours Faithfully,
Encl. Crossed IPO for Rs.10/-

(V.N.Sharma)




SPEEDPOST
UNDER RTI ACT 2005
SEEA/P/PF/0808
Sept.26, 2008
To
CPIO (Under RTI Act 2005)
Central Provident Fund Commissioner,
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhika Ji Kama Place,
New Delhi-110066.

Sub: Delay in payment of P.F. Revenue surplus by HSPF for the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 and 2002-03 to our members.
Ref.: Our letter No. SEEA/P/cpfc/0709 dated Nov. 20, 2007 (copy enclosed) with 26 pages of enclosures and two reminders by e-mail
Dear Sir,
Please refer to our above letter on the issue of non- payment of PF Revenue Surplus by HSPF of SAIL/RDCIS, Ranchi. Since the issue is hanging for a total of over 10 years we would like to have the following information from you under RTI Act 2005.
1. Complete details of the action taken by your office in this regard including the reasons of delay for the aforesaid payment to our members. Please provide documents including notings on the file, if any.
2. The reasons for not issuing directive to RPFC, Ranchi/RDCIS Management/ HSPF Trust in spite of a clear advice issued by your Central Office on 21st Nov. 2003 with regard to this payment?
3. Whether necessary action has been initiated against RPFC, Ranchi for not enforcing their order dated 14th June 2006.
4. Whether necessary action has been initiated against HSPF/ RDCIS for the unlawful act of not honouring the order of RPFC, Ranchi dated 14th June 2006.
Thanking you,
Yours Faithfully,


(V.N.Sharma)





weblog: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex
e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com

Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
SPEEDPOST
UNDER RTI ACT 2005

No. SEEA/P/0807
Sept. 24, 2008

Sri G.G.Gautam,
AGM (Personnel) & PIO,
Steel Authority of India Ltd.,
Ispat Bhawan, Lodi Road,
NEW DELHI- 110003.

Sub: Request for Information on our letter Nos.SEEA/P/0710 and 0711 dated 28.11. 2007, SEEA/P/0803 dt May 21, 2008 (copy attached) addressed to SAIL Chairman.
Dear Sir,

Please furnish complete detailed information about the action taken on the issues raised in our two letters addressed to Chairman, SAIL on Nov 28 2007, followed by a reminder summary letter on May 21, 2008. The following are only the points raised in the letter (except para 6). The letter addressed to SAIL Chairman contained all the enclosures needed to examine the issues.
1. Implementation of the order of CPFC and RPFC, Ranchi for payment of P.F. Revenue Surplus for the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 and 2002-03.
2. Illegal and unauthorised charging tariff for electricity for domestic consumption to our leased houses - Payment of Annual Lease Rent etc.
3. Issuance of Medical Cards to SAIL Ex-Employees from other Plants/Units at Ranchi in Ispat Hospital.Ranchi.(Copy of letter attached)
4. Providing Holding No. of the SAIL satellite Township for Registration of the “Agreement to Lease” for House No. A-100.
5. My letter No. VNS/A100/e-bill/ 0704 dated 17th July 2007 to General Manager (P&A), RDCIS & Appellate Authority under RTI Act 2005 on the subject of incomplete & unsatisfactory information by your PIO in Para 6 of his letter No. RD/RI(05)/16 dated 14/06/2007.
6. Please also let me know why SAIL and its Ranchi Unit RDCIS are becoming incommunicable and holding our money and facilities illegally. Also please tell me how to proceed to get our grievances heard and responded by SAIL and its Ranchi Units.

Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,

Encl: A crossed IPO No. 75E 643451 for Rs. 10/- as fees
(V.N.Sharma)
President




Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED
SEEA/P/0806
Sept. 24, 2008
To
Sri Ram Vilas Paswan,
Union Minister of Steel, Chemicals and Fertilisers,
Govt. of India, Udyog Bhawan,
NEW DELHI-110001

Sub: Withholding the payment of Revenue Surplus earned by Hindustan Steel Provident Fund (H.O.) Trust, Ranchi during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 to P.F. Members including Ex-Employees.
Ref.:Our letter No. SEEA/P/0805 dt.19th June 2008 addressed to you- Without action as yet. (Copy attached)
Hon’ble Ram Vilas Ji,
I would like to draw your kind attention to the above referred letter. This has remained without action for over three months now. I repeat our request to you to get our Revenue Surplus earnings held illegally by SAIL/RDCIS, Ranchi for over 11 years now. The details of the case was supplied with our above letter in June this year alongwith 7 enclosures in 26 pages.
I request you to please advise SAIL to order for release of this money by this Puja Festival so that Ex-Employees can get a sum and meaning to celebrate.
With kind regards,
Yours faithfully,
Encl: A/A

(V.N.Sharma)
President




Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED
SEEA/P/0805
June 19, 2008
To
Sri Ram Vilas Paswan,
Union Minister of Steel, Chemicals and Fertilisers,
Govt. of India, Udyog Bhawan,
NEW DELHI-110001

Sub: Withholding the payment of Revenue Surplus earned by Hindustan Steel Provident Fund (H.O.) Trust, Ranchi during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 to P.F. Members including Ex-Employees.
Ref.: Guidance/ clarification letter from CPFC New Delhi No. E III 3(1)2000-BR Genl./6269 dated 21.11.2003 and RPFC, Ranchi order No. JH/RO/RNC/ EXM/ 935/06/1369 dated 14th June 2006.
Hon’ble Ram Vilas Ji,
We would like to draw your kind attention to the fact that Hindustan Steel Provident Fund Trust (HSPF) for SAIL employees at Ranchi accumulated Surplus Revenue of Rs. 254 lakhs earned by them during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001(Annexure I). Half of this amount was distributed to the members in employment between April 01, 2002 and January 10, 2003. Employees retired before Jan 10, 2003 was not considered for payment. The issue was taken up by us with HSPF and SAIL/RDCIS who refused to oblige the Ex-Employees. Ultimately the payment of half of the amount was released to us after Central Provident Fund Commissioner issued a clear guidelines and advice vide their above referred letter (Annexure II) on the recommendation of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Ranchi.
Following this, we took up the issue of payment of remaining part (about 1/3rd) of the total Revenue Surplus but by the middle of 2005 it became clear to us that SAIL/RDCIS and HSPF Trust have no inclination to pay the remaining Revenue Surplus. The objective of writing this request letter to you is to please guide and advise SAIL/ RDCIS to gracefully follow the order of the CPFC and release the payment at the earliest as they do not have appropriate justification for withholding the payment. The details of the case are as follows.
1. That, the matter was formally taken up with Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Ranchi in September 2005.
2. That, we met RPFC and the concerned officers of his office several times which resulted in their order to the Trust for payment vide letter dated 14th June 2006 (copy in Annexure III).
3. That, HSPF submitted in reply a meaningless private auditor’s statement to RPFC, Ranchi as the basis for their refusal to pay (copy in Annexure IV)
4. That, we approached SAIL/RDCIS under Right to Information Act 2005 to provide complete information on the subject. Their reply alongwith 13 enclosures are enclosed herewith (as part of Annexure V).
5. That, we studied their reply and found no justification for withholding the payment of Revenue Surplus. We communicated our comments and observations of the facts supplied by them to SAIL/RDCIS Management vide our letter No. SEEA/P/PF/0611 dated Oct 26, 2006 and requested them several times to make early payment (Annexure VI). Both RDCIS Mgt. & HSPF Trust remained silent.
6. That, we approached SAIL Chairman vide our letter No. SEEA/P/0711 dated Nov. 28, 2007 for issuing an appropriate advice on this and several other issues related to Ex-Employees followed by a reminder vide letter No. SEEA/P/0803 dated May 21, 2008 Annexure VII). Nothing happenned.
7. That, this attitude of the HSPF Trust and SAIL and RDCIS Managements has really pained the SAIL Ex-Employees as all of them are retired and need their rightful share of money of the Revenue Surplus illegally held by the Trust and need that soon.
In view of the facts presented above we feel that all the vital information provided now by SAIL/ RDCIS under RTI Act 2005 were taken into account by CPFC and RPFC, Ranchi at the time the clarification was provided in favour of payment of total Revenue Surplus in Nov 2003 (Annexure II). There is nothing substantially different now. I am sure this must have been the basis for RPFC Ranchi also for issuing their order dated 14th June 2006 (Annexure III). In spite of this we have provided our comments and observations on the information provided by SAIL/ RDCIS under RTI Act 2005 which may be examined, if needed. We do not find any reason for withholding the payment of the Revenue Surplus kept with the HSPF Trust. The payment need to be done fast as our members are Sr. Citizens and such tactics of keeping silent for so long is not matching with the policy of your Govt. with respect to Sr. Citizens.
In view of this, we request you, Sir, to kindly issue an appropriate advice to SAIL and RDCIS, Ranchi to make the payments of the total amount of Revenue Surplus remaining with the Trust for such long years, alongwith the interest earned during this period, to all the members. We are ready to provide necessary assistance, if and when asked for on the issue of early payment of the Revenue Surplus.
With kind regards,
Yours faithfully,

(V.N.Sharma)
President
Encl: All 7 Annexure with enclosures (Annex 5 as complete set)




Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED
SEEA/P/0804
May 22, 2008
Sri S.K. Roongta,
Chairman,
Steel Authority of India Ltd.,
Ispat Bhawan, Lodhi Road,
NEW DELHI-10003
Sub: Suggestions to improve communication and usefulness of Ex-Employees.
Ref: Our letter No.SEEA/P/0803 dated 21st May 2008 (posted with this letter)
Dear Sir,
Our members, in a recent meeting, felt that Ex-Employees and their families are not treated well by the Company or its Units in their post retirement existence. Their legal and moral claims as perceived in their service condition and as part of the country’s laws are not respected. The above referred letter presents itself as an example as the issues are pending for years and years together. It is to the extent that laws related to
• fixing Electricity tariff,
• registration of agreement of leased houses,
• payment of PF Revenue Surplus withheld for more than 10 years and
• proper replies under RTI Act 2005 have been totally ignored.
It is unfair for SAIL or its Units not to meet their legal obligations under the law. In view of this our General Body decided to request you to do the following to improve level of interaction with Ex-Employees and establish meaningful relationship with the Ex-Employees.
a) Creation of a separate office/ post for handling cases and grievances of Ex-Employees (as done under RTI Act 2005).
b) Involve Ex-Employees in the conduct of peripheral development activities/ programmes of the Unit where they are settled.
c) Fix common facility charges like booking community halls, Clubs etc for marriage or other social obligations at par with regular employees.
d) Provide office space in the Township on the same terms and conditions as it is given to Association/Union of regular employees.
e) Fix guest house charges at par with those for regular employees
f) Enhance the amount of limit of OPD charges in Mediclaim policy from present Rs. 4000/- to Rs. 10,000/- per head per year and permit combining them for Ex-Employee and the spouse.
g) Treat the Ex-Employees and their spouse as Sr. Citizens and provide concessions to the extent the Government does.
We request you, therefore, to kindly issue necessary orders for implementation of the above. We feel that your positive decision on the aforesaid suggestions will help establish a good workable and useful relationship in the post retirement period for both the Company and the Ex-Employees.
With thanks and best regards,
Yours sincerely,

(V.N.Sharma)




Web: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED
(Reminder I)
COPY SEEA/P/0803
May 21, 2008
Sri S.K. Roongta,
Chairman,
Steel Authority of India Ltd.,
Ispat Bhawan, Lodhi Road,
NEW DELHI-10003
Sub:1.Issues – Pending for long without action by RDCIS Management.
2.Extension of Medical facilities to SAIL Ex-Employees from other Plants/Units at Ranchi in Ispat Hospital. Ranchi.
Ref: Our letter Nos.SEEA/P/0710 and 0711 dated 28.11. 2007 addressed to you
Dear Sir,
We are sorry to inform you that all the five issues raised in the above referred letters remain where they were without a reply or positive action. We would like to clarify at this stage that the issues mentioned in the letters are not demands. They are legally and morally justified claims of the Ex-Employees as part of their service condition or as part of the country’s law. As you must feel Ex-Employees need settlement of their dues and grievances at an early date as they have limitations of time before popping off without notice. Therefore, inaction and inefficient approach by Management is really painful. RDCIS, Ranchi under the stewardship of the present ED & I/c have failed to meet their obligations so far on any of the issues. This does not auger well for the company’s Ranchi Units or its present and Ex-Employees. It is unfair for SAIL or its Units not to meet their legal obligations under the law. The issues are listed below for your quick reference.
7. Implementation of the order of CPFC and RPFC, Ranchi for payment of P.F. Revenue Surplus for the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 and 2002-03.
8. Illegal and unauthorised charging tariff for electricity for domestic consumption to our leased houses - Payment of Annual Lease Rent etc.
9. Issuance of Medical Cards to SAIL Ex-Employees from other Plants/Units at Ranchi in Ispat Hospital.Ranchi.
10. Providing Holding No. of the SAIL satellite Township for Registration of the “Agreement to Lease” for House No. A-100.
11. My letter No. VNS/A100/e-bill/ 0704 dated 17th July 2007 to your General Manager (P&A) & Appellate Authority under RTI Act 2005 on the subject of incomplete & unsatisfactory information by your PIO in Para 6 of his letter No. RD/RI(05)/16 dated 14/06/2007.
We, therefore, request you to kindly intervene in the matter and get the issues resolved at an early date. We hope and believe that SAIL would look into it dispassionately and do the needful. Alternatively, please let us know where to go and who to approach to get the legally and morally justified claims of the Ex-Employees.
With thanks and best regards,
Yours sincerely,

(V.N.Sharma)




Blog: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
REGISTERED
(Reminder II)
SEEA/P/cpfc/0802
May 20, 2008
To
Central Provident Fund Commissioner,
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhika Ji Kama Place,
New Delhi-110066.

Sub: Non-Distribution of remaining 1/3rd Revenue Surplus earned by Hindustan Steel Provident Fund (H.O.) Trust, Ranchi during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 to P.F. Members
Ref.: Our Speedpost letter No. SEEA/P/cpfc/0709 dt. 20.11.2007 followed by e-mail Reminder dated 20.01.08 for implementation of your order.
Dear Sir,
This has reference to our above letters. A copy of each is enclosed (w/o enclosures) herewith for your kind perusal and necessary favourable decision without further delay on your guidance/ clarification letter No. E III 3(1)2000-BR Genl./6269 dated 21.11.2003 and RPFC, Ranchi order No. JH/RO/RNC/ EXM/ 935/06/1369 dated 14th June 2006. We would like to draw your kind attention to the fact that the issue is more than ten years old and this request is only to advise implementation of your previous order given more than 4 years ago.
I once again request you to please expedite implementation of your decision and release payment to the members of HSPF, Ranchi. Alternatively, please let us know the reasons that stop you from issuing a favourable repeat order.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,


(V.N.Sharma)
President
Encl. As above












e-mail: cpfc-epfo@nic.in
REMINDER I
Dear Sir,

This is to remind you that a letter was sent to you alongwith all the necessary enclosures by Speedpost on 21 st Nov. 2007. This is about non-implementation of your clarification made over 4 years ago regarding payment of Revenue Surplus. We have heard nothing so far even after two months of the despatch of this letter.
I request you to please expedite implementation of your decision and releasing payment to the members.

Dr.V.N.Sharma,
President
for SAIL Ex-Employees Association




SPEEDPOST
SEEA/P/0711
Nov. 28, 2007
Sri S.K. Roongta,
Chairman,
Steel Authority of India Ltd.,
Ispat Bhawan, Lodhi Road,
NEW DELHI-10003

Sub: Issues – Pending for long without action by RDCIS Management

Dear Sir,

Please find enclosed herewith a copy of my letter No. VNS/P/ 0708 dated 30th October 2007 addressed to Sri Jagdish Singh, ED & I/c RDCIS. It refers to a total of five issues pending for long without action by the RDCIS Management. The issues are of individual as well as collective nature and affect all categories of present and Ex- Employees now or later. The communications made to ED & I/c RDCIS during the tenure of the present incumbent on all the five issues remained without an action or a reply. This is causing uncalled for delay directly affecting me and other Ex-Employees, who also happen to be Sr. Citizen of the Society. It looks like that the RDCIS Management has become non-functional. The net result is that matter is becoming complex day by day, increasing the conflict interface and becoming difficult to resolve. This is also leading to violation of laws and legal provisions and forcing individuals to do unlawful activities which in our opinion are a serious matter.
In view of the aforesaid facts I request you to kindly intervene and advise the RDCIS Management to go for a definite, positive and legally foolproof action and to communicate a positive reply to these letters.

With thanks and best regards,
Yours sincerely,


(V.N.Sharma)