SPEEDPOST
SEEA/P/0711
Nov. 28, 2007
Sri S.K. Roongta,
Chairman,
Steel Authority of India Ltd.,
Ispat Bhawan, Lodhi Road,
NEW DELHI-10003
Sub: Issues – Pending for long without action by RDCIS Management
Dear Sir,
Please find enclosed herewith a copy of my letter No. VNS/P/ 0708 dated 30th October 2007 addressed to Sri Jagdish Singh, ED & I/c RDCIS. It refers to a total of five issues pending for long without action by the RDCIS Management. The issues are of individual as well as collective nature and affect all categories of present and Ex- Employees now or later. The communications made to ED & I/c RDCIS during the tenure of the present incumbent on all the five issues remained without an action or a reply. This is causing uncalled for delay directly affecting me and other Ex-Employees, who also happen to be Sr. Citizen of the Society. It looks like that the RDCIS Management has become non-functional. The net result is that matter is becoming complex day by day, increasing the conflict interface and becoming difficult to resolve. This is also leading to violation of laws and legal provisions and forcing individuals to do unlawful activities which in our opinion are a serious matter.
In view of the aforesaid facts I request you to kindly intervene and advise the RDCIS Management to go for a definite, positive and legally foolproof action and to communicate a positive reply to these letters.
With thanks and best regards,
Yours sincerely,
(V.N.Sharma)
*******************************
Blog: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
SPEEDPOST
SEEA/P/0710
Nov. 28, 2007
Sri S.K. Roongta,
Chairman,
Steel Authority of India Ltd.,
Ispat Bhawan, Lodhi Road,
NEW DELHI-10003
Sub: Extension of Medical facilities to SAIL Ex-Employees from other Plants/Units at Ranchi in Ispat Hospital. Ranchi.
Dear Sir,
We have a few SAIL Ex-Employees from the Plants/ Units other than Ranchi settled in this city after their retirement from service. We are sorry to inform you that they are not being allowed medical facilities in Ispat Hospital, Ranchi which is administered by MECON Ltd. We took up the issue with ED & I/c RDCIS followed by those with CMD, MECON. Reply from RDCIS is non - committal and MECON’s reply is in negative. We request you for your kind intervention to get SAIL Ex-Employees from the Plants/ Units other than Ranchi the medical facilities in Ispat Hospital, Ranchi at par with the Ex-Employees from Ranchi Units.
That, the Ispat Hospital is under the administrative control of MECON Ltd. but provides Health care to both SAIL and MECON employees including Ex-Employees without discrimination and for all practical purposes it is a SAIL Hospital for Health Care purposes. The health care facilities are extended to both Ex- and Current employees of SAIL as per SAIL Rules and for those of MECON as per MECON Rules. As per SAIL Medical Policy SAIL Ex-Employees are entitled to get the medical facilities either in their Plant/Unit Hospitals from where they retired or where they settle after retirement for which necessary formalities are required to be completed if such recognized Hospitals exist in those places. Since SAIL Ranchi Units did not establish a Health care Unit/ Hospital of its own in Ranchi and depended all these years on Ispat Hospital, Ranchi it is clear that SAIL Ex-Employees from other Units settled in Ranchi are entitled to get Medical facilities in Ispat Hospital at par with what is applicable to SAIL Ex-Employees of Ranchi Units.
We would also like to add that the SAIL Ex-Employees are Sr. Citizens who need more social support for Health care due to their age and physical condition. The present Government of India and those in States have shown their commitment to further improve the life and living conditions of the Sr. Citizens. MECON have revised their Medical Policy and Rules recently in favour of MECON Ex-Employees but we fail to understand why they refuse the same to SAIL Ex-Employees of non-Ranchi Units when they are entitled for it.
I request you, Sir, to use your kind influence to help SAIL Ex-Employees of non-Ranchi Units in getting Medical facilities in Ispat Hospital at par with those retired from Ranchi Units. We shall be obliged to you for this.
With thanks and best regards,
Yours sincerely,
(V.N.Sharma)
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
SPEEDPOST
SEEA/P/cpfc/0709
Nov. 20, 2007
To
Central Provident Fund Commissioner,
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhika Ji Kama Place,
New Delhi-110066.
Sub: Non-Distribution of remaining 1/3rd Revenue Surplus earned by Hindustan Steel Provident Fund (H.O.) Trust, Ranchi during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 to P.F. Members
Ref.: Your guidance/ clarification letter No. E III 3(1)2000-BR Genl./6269 dated 21.11.2003 and RPFC, Ranchi order No. JH/RO/RNC/ EXM/ 935/06/1369 dated 14th June 2006.
Dear Sir,
This is to bring to your kind attention that the HSPF Trust has failed to distribute the total Revenue Surplus earned by them during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 in spite of your clarification vide your letter referred above (Annexure I). The details of the case are as follows.
1. That, following your above clarification forwarded by RPFC Ranchi to SAIL/RDCIS vide their letter No. JH/RO/RNC/ EXM/ 935/2003/7297 dated 8th Dec. 2003 half of the Revenue Surplus was paid to all the eligible members of the Trust.
2. That, further discussions were held several times between SAIL Ex-Employees Association and the SAIL/RDCIS and HSPF Trust representatives for payment of remaining 1/3rd Revenue Surplus.
3. That, by the middle of 2005 it became clear to us that SAIL/RDCIS and HSPF Trust have no inclination to pay the remaining Revenue Surplus. We made a formal appeal to Chairman HSPF Trust vide our letter dated 10th Sept 2005 (Annexure II).
4. That, the individual members approached RPFC, Ranchi in the later part of Sept.2005 with a formal representation (sample copy in Annexure III) requesting him to order for the payment of the remaining amount in Revenue Surplus on the basis of your clarification.
5. That, we met RPFC and the concerned officers of his office several times which resulted in their order to the Trust for payment vide letter dated 14th June 2006 (copy in Annexure IV).
6. That, HSPF refused to honour the order and submitted a private auditor’s statement to RPFC, Ranchi as the basis for their refusal (copy in Annexure V)
7. That, we approached SAIL/RDCIS under Right to Information Act 2005 to provide complete information on the subject. Their reply alongwith 13 enclosures is enclosed herewith (as a part of Annexure VI).
8. That, we studied their reply and found no justification for withholding the payment of Revenue Surplus. We communicated our comments and observations of the facts supplied by them to SAIL/RDCIS Management and requested them to make early payment.
9. That, after waiting for some time we sent complete set of information obtained from SAIL/RDCIS to RPFC Ranchi alongwith our comments and observations on 01st Nov 2006 (Annexure VI) justifying our stand for early payment and for implementation of your clarification and their own order referred to above without further delay.
10. That, we waited for over four months and submitted a letter on 19th March 2007 to PIO, RPFC Ranchi under Right to Information Act 2005 seeking information on this issue.. Though satisfactory answer was not provided yet a letter was issued by APFC, Ranchi to Secretary HSPF Trust to hold a meeting with us (Annexure VII). Secretary HSPF did not arrange the desired meeting.
11. That, although this lack of interest in holding the meeting or making payment by HSPF Trust was pointed out to RPFC, Ranchi vide letters dated 11th May and 17th July 2007 (Annexures VIII & IX), preceded and followed by telephonic discussions no further action was initiated by them. No order for payment of the Revenue Surplus has been made by RPFC Ranchi till this date.
12. That, this attitude of the HSPF Trust and indifference of the RPFC, Ranchi has really pained the SAIL Ex-Employees as all of them are retired and need their rightful share of money of the Revenue Surplus illegally held by the Trust and need that soon.
In view of the facts presented above we feel that all the vital information provided now by SAIL/ RDCIS under RTI Act 2005 were taken into account by you at the time the clarification was provided in favour of payment of total Revenue Surplus in Nov 2003 (Annexure I). There is nothing substantially different. I am sure this must have been the basis for RPFC Ranchi also for issuing their order dated 14th June 2006 (Annexure IV). In spite of this we have provided our comments and observations on the information provided by SAIL/ RDCIS under RTI Act 2005 in our letter to RPFC Ranchi (Annexure VI) which may be examined, if needed. We do not find any reason for withholding the payment of the Revenue Surplus kept with the HSPF Trust.
We request you, therefore to kindly issue an appropriate advice to RPFC, Ranchi to issue final order/ directive to SAIL/RDCIS & HSPF Trust, Ranchi to make the payments of the total amount remaining with the Trust for such long years, alongwith the interest earned during this period, to all the members. We are ready to provide necessary assistance, if and when asked for for making a final order/ directive on the issue for early payment.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
(V.N.Sharma)
President
Encl: All 9 Annexure with enclosures in the SPEEDPOST (Consignment No. EE876342191IN)
SEEA/P/cpfc/0709
Nov. 20, 2007
To
Central Provident Fund Commissioner,
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhika Ji Kama Place,
New Delhi-110066.
Sub: Non-Distribution of remaining 1/3rd Revenue Surplus earned by Hindustan Steel Provident Fund (H.O.) Trust, Ranchi during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 to P.F. Members
Ref.: Your guidance/ clarification letter No. E III 3(1)2000-BR Genl./6269 dated 21.11.2003 and RPFC, Ranchi order No. JH/RO/RNC/ EXM/ 935/06/1369 dated 14th June 2006.
Dear Sir,
This is to bring to your kind attention that the HSPF Trust has failed to distribute the total Revenue Surplus earned by them during the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 in spite of your clarification vide your letter referred above (Annexure I). The details of the case are as follows.
1. That, following your above clarification forwarded by RPFC Ranchi to SAIL/RDCIS vide their letter No. JH/RO/RNC/ EXM/ 935/2003/7297 dated 8th Dec. 2003 half of the Revenue Surplus was paid to all the eligible members of the Trust.
2. That, further discussions were held several times between SAIL Ex-Employees Association and the SAIL/RDCIS and HSPF Trust representatives for payment of remaining 1/3rd Revenue Surplus.
3. That, by the middle of 2005 it became clear to us that SAIL/RDCIS and HSPF Trust have no inclination to pay the remaining Revenue Surplus. We made a formal appeal to Chairman HSPF Trust vide our letter dated 10th Sept 2005 (Annexure II).
4. That, the individual members approached RPFC, Ranchi in the later part of Sept.2005 with a formal representation (sample copy in Annexure III) requesting him to order for the payment of the remaining amount in Revenue Surplus on the basis of your clarification.
5. That, we met RPFC and the concerned officers of his office several times which resulted in their order to the Trust for payment vide letter dated 14th June 2006 (copy in Annexure IV).
6. That, HSPF refused to honour the order and submitted a private auditor’s statement to RPFC, Ranchi as the basis for their refusal (copy in Annexure V)
7. That, we approached SAIL/RDCIS under Right to Information Act 2005 to provide complete information on the subject. Their reply alongwith 13 enclosures is enclosed herewith (as a part of Annexure VI).
8. That, we studied their reply and found no justification for withholding the payment of Revenue Surplus. We communicated our comments and observations of the facts supplied by them to SAIL/RDCIS Management and requested them to make early payment.
9. That, after waiting for some time we sent complete set of information obtained from SAIL/RDCIS to RPFC Ranchi alongwith our comments and observations on 01st Nov 2006 (Annexure VI) justifying our stand for early payment and for implementation of your clarification and their own order referred to above without further delay.
10. That, we waited for over four months and submitted a letter on 19th March 2007 to PIO, RPFC Ranchi under Right to Information Act 2005 seeking information on this issue.. Though satisfactory answer was not provided yet a letter was issued by APFC, Ranchi to Secretary HSPF Trust to hold a meeting with us (Annexure VII). Secretary HSPF did not arrange the desired meeting.
11. That, although this lack of interest in holding the meeting or making payment by HSPF Trust was pointed out to RPFC, Ranchi vide letters dated 11th May and 17th July 2007 (Annexures VIII & IX), preceded and followed by telephonic discussions no further action was initiated by them. No order for payment of the Revenue Surplus has been made by RPFC Ranchi till this date.
12. That, this attitude of the HSPF Trust and indifference of the RPFC, Ranchi has really pained the SAIL Ex-Employees as all of them are retired and need their rightful share of money of the Revenue Surplus illegally held by the Trust and need that soon.
In view of the facts presented above we feel that all the vital information provided now by SAIL/ RDCIS under RTI Act 2005 were taken into account by you at the time the clarification was provided in favour of payment of total Revenue Surplus in Nov 2003 (Annexure I). There is nothing substantially different. I am sure this must have been the basis for RPFC Ranchi also for issuing their order dated 14th June 2006 (Annexure IV). In spite of this we have provided our comments and observations on the information provided by SAIL/ RDCIS under RTI Act 2005 in our letter to RPFC Ranchi (Annexure VI) which may be examined, if needed. We do not find any reason for withholding the payment of the Revenue Surplus kept with the HSPF Trust.
We request you, therefore to kindly issue an appropriate advice to RPFC, Ranchi to issue final order/ directive to SAIL/RDCIS & HSPF Trust, Ranchi to make the payments of the total amount remaining with the Trust for such long years, alongwith the interest earned during this period, to all the members. We are ready to provide necessary assistance, if and when asked for for making a final order/ directive on the issue for early payment.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
(V.N.Sharma)
President
Encl: All 9 Annexure with enclosures in the SPEEDPOST (Consignment No. EE876342191IN)
Monday, November 05, 2007
Not on the Letter Pad
SPEEDPOST
No. VNS/P/ 0708
05th Nov. 2007
Sri Jagdish Singh,
Executive Director & I/c,
RDCIS/ SAIL,
Ranchi-834002.
Sub: Issues – Pending for long without action
Dear Sri Singh,
I addressed the following communications to you and your colleagues. Even those of them written on individual basis have a collective connotation for the benefits of all categories of Employees – Ex as well as current ones. Very surprisingly all of them – posted during your stewardship of SAIL/RDCIS - remained unanswered and without action till this day. I have added ‘Implication’ of inaction on your part - some of them being serious ones have been added to each para for your kind perusal.
1. Our letter No. SEEA/P/PF/0611 dated Oct 26, 2006 to implement the order of CPFC and RPFC, Ranchi for payment of P.F. Revenue surplus for the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 and 2002-03 to members of HSPF Trust followed by a reminder letter No. SEEA/P/PF/0705 dated July 17, 2007.
Action: Nil/ Absolute Silence
Implication: Holding illegally of Employees money without justification.
2. My letter Nos. VNS/A100/0609 dtd. 07th Dec 2006 and VNS/A100/0610 dated 29th Dec 2006 regarding illegal and unauthorised charging tariff for electricity for domestic consumption to my leased house - Payment of Annual Lease Rent etc.
Action: Nil/ Absolute Silence
Implication: That the electricity bill has been raised again for this year in the same manner.
SPEEDPOST
No. VNS/P/ 0708
05th Nov. 2007
Sri Jagdish Singh,
Executive Director & I/c,
RDCIS/ SAIL,
Ranchi-834002.
Sub: Issues – Pending for long without action
Dear Sri Singh,
I addressed the following communications to you and your colleagues. Even those of them written on individual basis have a collective connotation for the benefits of all categories of Employees – Ex as well as current ones. Very surprisingly all of them – posted during your stewardship of SAIL/RDCIS - remained unanswered and without action till this day. I have added ‘Implication’ of inaction on your part - some of them being serious ones have been added to each para for your kind perusal.
1. Our letter No. SEEA/P/PF/0611 dated Oct 26, 2006 to implement the order of CPFC and RPFC, Ranchi for payment of P.F. Revenue surplus for the years 1996-97 to 2000-2001 and 2002-03 to members of HSPF Trust followed by a reminder letter No. SEEA/P/PF/0705 dated July 17, 2007.
Action: Nil/ Absolute Silence
Implication: Holding illegally of Employees money without justification.
2. My letter Nos. VNS/A100/0609 dtd. 07th Dec 2006 and VNS/A100/0610 dated 29th Dec 2006 regarding illegal and unauthorised charging tariff for electricity for domestic consumption to my leased house - Payment of Annual Lease Rent etc.
Action: Nil/ Absolute Silence
Implication: That the electricity bill has been raised again for this year in the same manner.
3. Our letter No. SEEA/P/0706 dated May 14, 2007 Issuance of Medical Cards to SAIL Ex-Employees from other Plants/Units at Ranchi in Ispat Hospital.Ranchi.
Action: A negative reply with no further effort made
Implication: Lack of serious positive action to get the extension of Health care facilities in Ispat Hospital, Ranchi to such Ex-Employees (Sr. Citizens) mentioned above
4. My request vide my letter No.VNS/A100/Regn/ 0701 dated 26th July 2007 to provide Holding No. of the SAIL satellite Township for Registration of the “Agreement to Lease” for House No. A-100.
Action: Nil/ Absolute Silence
Implication: Registration getting delayed which is obligatory on your part to extend all help
5. My letter No. VNS/A100/e-bill/ 0704 dated 17th July 2007 to your General Manager (P&A) & Appellate Authority under RTI Act 2005 on the subject of incomplete & unsatisfactory information by your PIO in Para 6 of his letter No. RD/RI(05)/16 dated 14/06/2007.
Action: Nil/ Absolute Silence
Implication: An obligation on Appellate Authority to provide correct and complete information under RTI Act 2005 stands violated.
In view of the uncalled for delay directly affecting me and other Ex-Employees, who also happen to be Sr. Citizen of the Society I request you to kindly let me know how long this will take to go for a definite and positive action and to communicate a positive reply to these letters. This will help in taking the issues to different forums for redressal of my/our grievances.
Thanking You,
Yours faithfully,
(V.N.Sharma)
A-100, SAIL Satellite Township
Ranchi 834004 Jharkhand India
e-mail:vnsh44@gmail.com
Ph:9431102680/0651-2441524
***************
Blog: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
Action: A negative reply with no further effort made
Implication: Lack of serious positive action to get the extension of Health care facilities in Ispat Hospital, Ranchi to such Ex-Employees (Sr. Citizens) mentioned above
4. My request vide my letter No.VNS/A100/Regn/ 0701 dated 26th July 2007 to provide Holding No. of the SAIL satellite Township for Registration of the “Agreement to Lease” for House No. A-100.
Action: Nil/ Absolute Silence
Implication: Registration getting delayed which is obligatory on your part to extend all help
5. My letter No. VNS/A100/e-bill/ 0704 dated 17th July 2007 to your General Manager (P&A) & Appellate Authority under RTI Act 2005 on the subject of incomplete & unsatisfactory information by your PIO in Para 6 of his letter No. RD/RI(05)/16 dated 14/06/2007.
Action: Nil/ Absolute Silence
Implication: An obligation on Appellate Authority to provide correct and complete information under RTI Act 2005 stands violated.
In view of the uncalled for delay directly affecting me and other Ex-Employees, who also happen to be Sr. Citizen of the Society I request you to kindly let me know how long this will take to go for a definite and positive action and to communicate a positive reply to these letters. This will help in taking the issues to different forums for redressal of my/our grievances.
Thanking You,
Yours faithfully,
(V.N.Sharma)
A-100, SAIL Satellite Township
Ranchi 834004 Jharkhand India
e-mail:vnsh44@gmail.com
Ph:9431102680/0651-2441524
***************
Blog: http://canvas.nowpos.com/sailex e-mail: seearanchi@gmail.com
SPEEDPOST
SEEA/P/0708
Nov. 05, 2007
Sri Drone Rath,
Chairman-cum-M.D.,
MECON Ltd.,
Ranchi-834002.
Ref: Letter No. 11.73 dated Aug. 30, 2007 from your DGM & I/c (P) refusing our request vide our letter No. SEEA/P/0707 dated 26th July 2007
Dear Sri Rath,
We are in receipt of your refusal to extend Medical facilities in Ispat Hospital to SAIL Ex-Employees from non – Ranchi Plants/ Units settled in Ranchi after retirement. We would like to request you once again to kindly reconsider your decision and help SAIL Ex-Employees of non-Ranchi Units.
That, the Ispat Hospital is under the administrative control of MECON Ltd. but provides Health care to both SAIL and MECON employees including Ex-Employees without discrimination.. The health care facilities are extended to both Ex- and Current employees of the SAIL as per SAIL Rules and MECON as per MECON Rules. For the purposes of Health care, SAIL Ex-Employees are entitled to get the medical facilities either in their Plant/Unit Hospitals from where they retired or where they settle after retirement if such recognized Hospitals exist in those places provide they make a request to this effect. It is clear from this that SAIL Ex-Employees from other Units settled in Ranchi are entitled to get Medical facilities in Ispat Hospital at par with what is applicable to SAIL Ex-Employees of Ranchi Units.
We would also like to add that the SAIL Ex-Employees are Sr. Citizens who need more social support for Health care due to their age and physical condition. The present Government of India and those in States have shown their commitment to further improve the life and living conditions of the Sr. Citizens. You have also done it for MECON Ex-Employees but we fail to understand why you refuse the same to SAIL Ex-Employees of non-Ranchi Units when they are entitled to it.
I request you once again, Sir, to use your kind influence and a positive approach to help SAIL Ex-Employees of non-Ranchi Units, who also happen to be the Sr. Citizens, in getting Medical facilities in Ispat Hospital at par with those retired from Ranchi Units.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
SEEA/P/0708
Nov. 05, 2007
Sri Drone Rath,
Chairman-cum-M.D.,
MECON Ltd.,
Ranchi-834002.
Ref: Letter No. 11.73 dated Aug. 30, 2007 from your DGM & I/c (P) refusing our request vide our letter No. SEEA/P/0707 dated 26th July 2007
Dear Sri Rath,
We are in receipt of your refusal to extend Medical facilities in Ispat Hospital to SAIL Ex-Employees from non – Ranchi Plants/ Units settled in Ranchi after retirement. We would like to request you once again to kindly reconsider your decision and help SAIL Ex-Employees of non-Ranchi Units.
That, the Ispat Hospital is under the administrative control of MECON Ltd. but provides Health care to both SAIL and MECON employees including Ex-Employees without discrimination.. The health care facilities are extended to both Ex- and Current employees of the SAIL as per SAIL Rules and MECON as per MECON Rules. For the purposes of Health care, SAIL Ex-Employees are entitled to get the medical facilities either in their Plant/Unit Hospitals from where they retired or where they settle after retirement if such recognized Hospitals exist in those places provide they make a request to this effect. It is clear from this that SAIL Ex-Employees from other Units settled in Ranchi are entitled to get Medical facilities in Ispat Hospital at par with what is applicable to SAIL Ex-Employees of Ranchi Units.
We would also like to add that the SAIL Ex-Employees are Sr. Citizens who need more social support for Health care due to their age and physical condition. The present Government of India and those in States have shown their commitment to further improve the life and living conditions of the Sr. Citizens. You have also done it for MECON Ex-Employees but we fail to understand why you refuse the same to SAIL Ex-Employees of non-Ranchi Units when they are entitled to it.
I request you once again, Sir, to use your kind influence and a positive approach to help SAIL Ex-Employees of non-Ranchi Units, who also happen to be the Sr. Citizens, in getting Medical facilities in Ispat Hospital at par with those retired from Ranchi Units.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
(V.N.Sharma)
President
******************
MECON LIMITED
A Government of India Enterprise
Ranchi-834002, Jharkhand, India
Phone : 0651-2480002/2480216
Fax : 0651-2482189/2482214
E-Mail : mecon-rnch@mecon.co.in
Web site : http:/www.meconlimited.com
11.73. August 30, 2007
Sri VN Sharma,
President,
SAIL Ex-Employees Association,
A-100 SAIL Satellite Townshiip,
Ranchi 834 004
seearanchi@gmail.com
Ref : Your letter No.SEEA/P/0707 dtd. 26th July ‘07
Dear Sir,
This has reference to your letter dated 26th July ’07 referred to above, addressed to our Chairman-cum-Managing Director requesting medical facilities in Ispat Hospital to all SAIL Ex-employees settled in Ranchi after retirement from other SAIL Plants/Units. Your request has been considered by the Competent Authority and we regret to inform you that it is not possible to accede to your request.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
For MECON LIMITED,
( M TIRKEY )
DY. GENERAL MANAGER I/c (P)
ISO 9001 Company
************************
A Government of India Enterprise
Ranchi-834002, Jharkhand, India
Phone : 0651-2480002/2480216
Fax : 0651-2482189/2482214
E-Mail : mecon-rnch@mecon.co.in
Web site : http:/www.meconlimited.com
11.73. August 30, 2007
Sri VN Sharma,
President,
SAIL Ex-Employees Association,
A-100 SAIL Satellite Townshiip,
Ranchi 834 004
seearanchi@gmail.com
Ref : Your letter No.SEEA/P/0707 dtd. 26th July ‘07
Dear Sir,
This has reference to your letter dated 26th July ’07 referred to above, addressed to our Chairman-cum-Managing Director requesting medical facilities in Ispat Hospital to all SAIL Ex-employees settled in Ranchi after retirement from other SAIL Plants/Units. Your request has been considered by the Competent Authority and we regret to inform you that it is not possible to accede to your request.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
For MECON LIMITED,
( M TIRKEY )
DY. GENERAL MANAGER I/c (P)
ISO 9001 Company
************************
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- SAIL Ex-Employees Association
- provides a Social Connectivity link to its members which is operated through picnics, meetings and e-mail communications
